[cabfpub] BR clarification re: test certificates

[Gervase Markham]

On 13/04/17 19:19, Curt Spann wrote:
> CES: Did you really intended for the ‘either/both’ instead of just
> ‘both'? I don’t think it would be a good idea to only have a
> certificate’s revoked status in one form the of the revocation data
> and not the other.

I think that's really shorthand for "all the revocation methods which
are BR-required and any of your choice which are BR-allowed for that
particular certificate".

Gerv