[cabfpub] Ballot 196: Define "Audit Period"

Dimitris Zacharopoulos jimmy at it.auth.gr
Tue Apr 11 10:16:03 UTC 2017


HARICA votes "yes" to ballot 196.


Dimitris.

On 3/4/2017 9:05 μμ, Gervase Markham via Public wrote:
>
> *Ballot 196 - Define "Audit Period"
> *
>
> *Purpose of Ballot: *It appears that CAs are sometimes confused by the 
> phrase Audit Period. This ballot adds a definition of that phrase to 
> the BRs, in the hope of heading off any further misunderstandings.
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Gervase Markham of Mozilla 
> and endorsed by Ryan Sleevi of Google and Jody Cloutier of Microsoft:
>
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
>
> Add the following definition to section 1.6.1 of the Baseline 
> Requirements:
> *Audit Period:*  In a period-of-time audit, the period between the first day (start) 
> and the last day of operations (end) covered by the auditors in their 
> engagement. (This is not the same as the period of time when the auditors are on-site at the CA.) The coverage rules and maximum length of audit periods are defined in section 8.1.
> -- MOTION ENDS --
>
>
> The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot 
> is as follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply 
> with applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
>
> BALLOT 196
>
> Status: Final Maintenance Guideline
>
> 	
>
> Start time (23:00 UTC)
>
> 	
>
> End time (23:00 UTC)
>
> Discussion (7 to 14 days)
>
> 	
>
> 3rd April
>
> 	
>
> 10th April
>
> Vote for approval (7 days)
>
> 	
>
> 10th April
>
> 	
>
> 17th April
>
> If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) 
> (30 days).
>
> If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to 
> be created.
>
> If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of 
> Review Period.
>
> 	
>
> Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
> 	
>
> 30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair
>
> From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final 
> Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or 
> comparison showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline 
> section(s) intended to become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need 
> not include a copy of the full set of guidelines.  Such redline or 
> comparison shall be made against the Final Guideline section(s) as 
> they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need not take into 
> consideration other ballots that may be proposed subsequently, except 
> as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the 
> Public list.  A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 
> 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in 
> the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the 
> response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote 
> received from any representative of a voting member before the close 
> of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: 
> https://cabforum.org/members/
>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes 
> cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes 
> cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is 
> shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki.  Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the 
> required quorum number must participate in the ballot for the ballot 
> to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170411/cc6894a2/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Public mailing list