[cabfpub] RFC5280-related Ballot - For Discussion

[Ryan Sleevi]

For those who want to understand why the IETF rejected this change, the
thread begins at

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pkix/MJwKL1lqRDuEAhqQ1Ydb5eWBSIs/?qid=ace7ed4844045716922706d6a80b0747

You can also see https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/376/ and the
discussion at
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/current/msg02361.html

This was reviewed prior to the production of 5280 - that is, it was known
at the time 5280 was produced, and was decided not to adopt - see
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/current/msg02357.html and
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/pkix/current/msg02336.html

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Ben Wilson via Public <public at cabforum.org>
wrote:

> Here is a redlined version of sections 7.1.4.2.1 and 7.1.4.2.2 of the
> Baseline Requirements which proposes amendments to the way the Baseline
> Requirements handle the maximum length for subjectAltName, commonName and
> organizationName and also clarifies the use of the underscore character.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Ben Wilson, JD, CISA, CISSP*
>
> VP Compliance
>
> +1 801 701 9678 <(801)%20701-9678>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170403/2ee2f7e2/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6114 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170403/2ee2f7e2/attachment-0003.jpg>