[cabfpub] RFC 3647 Compliance

[Ryan Sleevi]

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:

>
> On Apr 25, 2017, at 5:00 PM, Ryan Sleevi via Public <public at cabforum.org>
> wrote:
>
> Like we talked about at the recent F2F in Raleigh, I'd love to see a world
> where we can slowly move to consistent CP/CPSes. This is especially
> important for efforts like the CCADB with Microsoft's help, or the BR
> self-assessments that Mozilla's requesting.
>
> You can see the initial proposed edits at https://github.com/sleevi/
> cabforum-docs/pull/3/files , along with explanations for the motivations
> for these.
>
>
> Am I correct that you are using “MUST be structured in accordance with
> RFC 3647” as short hand for “MUST include all the section headings
> specified in the outline in RFC 3647 section 6”?  Should it say that
> sections without subordinate headings and without content need to specify
> “No stipulation” or is that too specific?
>

That's a great point. Certainly, the intent is that all the section
headings are present, in the same order and with the prescribed
content/topic of discussion.

I'd love to hear from others, but I actually think "No stipulation" is a
useful and valuable addition.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170425/27aa9b27/attachment-0001.html>