[cabfpub] [EXTERNAL]Re: Draft Agenda for CABF teleconference April 27
gerv at mozilla.org
Mon Apr 24 09:55:33 MST 2017
On 23/04/17 21:08, Kirk Hall via Public wrote:
> We always review the status of ballots.
I can see the value in making sure we keep track of ballots. Perhaps,
though, the agenda for a teleconference might not be the best place?
There are, as we know, various ballot phases:
1) Drafting period
2) Discussion period
3) Voting period
4) IPR review period
It seems to me that having a standing agenda item for 2) and 3) makes
most sense. Ballots in stage 1) could be added at the request of the
lead drafter. Unless there is an Exclusion Notice, ballots in stage 4)
are not very interesting (and their exit from IPR review is heralded by
an email to the list).
So perhaps it might make most sense to have a public web page somewhere
where we keep track of which ballot is in which stage, but confine the
agenda items to groups 2) and 3)?
More information about the Public