[cabfpub] Ballot 189 (revised) - Amend Section 6.1.7 of Base line Requirements

[realsky(CHT)]

 Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd. votes Yes to ballot 189.

          Li-Chun Chen


-----Original message-----
From:Peter Miškovič via Public<public at cabforum.org>
To:CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List<public at cabforum.org>
Cc:Peter Miškovič<Peter.Miskovic at disig.sk>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 22:55:30
Subject: [外部郵件] Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 189 (revised) - Amend Section 6.1.7 of Baseline Requirements
Disig votes „YES“.
 
Regards
Peter
 
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org]On Behalf Of Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 9:47 AM
To: public at cabforum.org
Cc: Dimitris Zacharopoulos <jimmy at it.auth.gr>
Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot 189 (revised) - Amend Section 6.1.7 of Baseline Requirements

 

After the recent discussion, the ballot is now updated with simpler language. Voting starts tomorrow April 6th.

Dimitris.


Ballot 189 - Amend Section 6.1.7 of Baseline Requirements
The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and endorsed by Bruce Morton of Entrust and Jeremy Rowley of Digicert
Background: 
Section 6.1.7 of the Baseline Requirements states that the Root CA Private Keys MUST NOT be used to sign end-entity certificates, with some exceptions. It is unclear if this exception list includes end-entity certificates with EKU id-kp-timeStamping. This ballot attempts to clarify two things: 
that it affects Root Keys in a hierarchy that issues SSL Certificates and that it does not include time stamping certificates in the exception list. It also clears the exception language for 1024-bit RSA Subscriber Certificates and testing products with Certificates issued by a Root.
-- MOTION BEGINS -- 
Current section 6.1.7 
Root CA Private Keys MUST NOT be used to sign Certificates except in the following cases:
Self-signed Certificates to represent the Root Certificate itself; Certificates for Subordinate CAs and Cross Certificates; Certificates for infrastructure purposes (e.g. administrative role certificates, internal CA operational device certificates, and OCSP Response verification Certificates);Certificates issued solely for the purpose of testing products with Certificates issued by a Root CA; andSubscriber Certificates, provided that: The Root CA uses a 1024-bit RSA signing key that was created prior to the Effective Date;The Applicant’s application was deployed prior to the Effective Date; The Applicant’s application is in active use by the Applicant or the CA uses a documented process to establish that the Certificate’s use is required by a substantial number of Relying Parties;The CA follows a documented process to determine that the Applicant’s application poses no known security risks to Relying Parties;The CA documents that the Applicant’s application cannot be patched or replaced without substantial economic outlay.The CA signs the Subscriber Certificate on or before June 30, 2016; and The notBefore field in the Subscriber Certificate has a date on or before June 30, 2016Proposed section 6.1.7 
Private Keys corresponding to Root Certificates MUST NOT be used to sign Certificates except in the following cases:
Self-signed Certificates to represent the Root CA itself; Certificates for Subordinate CAs and Cross Certificates; Certificates for infrastructure purposes (administrative role certificates, internal CA operational device certificates)Certificates for OCSP Response verification; These changes become Effective 30 days after the ballot passes.
-- MOTION ENDS -- 
The procedure for this ballot is as follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply with applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
BALLOT 189 Status: Amend BR 6.1.7 
Start time (22:00 UTC)
End time (22:00 UTC) 

Discussion (7 days) 
30 March 2017 
6 April 2017 

Vote for approval (7 days) 
6 April 2017 
13 April 2017 

If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30 days)
If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to be created.
If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of Review Period.
Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public Mail List.
Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair


From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the full set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made against the Final Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need not take into consideration other ballots that may be proposed subsequently, except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j). 
Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here:https://cabforum.org/members/ 
In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the required quorum number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public




本信件可能包含中華電信股份有限公司機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿蒐集、處理或利用本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件. 如為指定收件者,應確實保護郵件中本公司之營業機密及個人資料,不得任意傳佈或揭露,並應自行確認本郵件之附檔與超連結之安全性,以共同善盡資訊安全與個資保護責任. 
Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to ensure the information security and to protect personal information.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20170414/6e9658f7/attachment-0001.html>