[cabfpub] When to stop accepting old ETSI audits?

tScheme Technical Manager richard.trevorah at tScheme.org
Mon Nov 28 23:05:58 UTC 2016

Technically, eIDAS gave July 2016 as the cutoff but allowed one year for transition. However, it states that any audits after July 2016 must use new requirements.




Richard Trevorah
Technical Manager
tScheme Limited

M: +44 (0) 781 809 4728
F: +44 (0) 870 005 6311


The information in this message and, if present, any attachments are intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). The content of this e-mail and its attachments is confidential and may be legally privileged. Unless otherwise stated, any use or disclosure is unauthorised and may be unlawful.

If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender as soon as practicable



From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Moudrick M. Dadashov via Public
Sent: 28 November 2016 22:59
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List
Cc: Moudrick M. Dadashov
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] When to stop accepting old ETSI audits?


Yes, July 2017 is reasonable - the new ones require extra bureaucracy with the supervisors.


On 11/28/2016 3:44 PM, Gervase Markham via Public wrote:

Dear CAB Forum members,
Ballot 171, passed on 1st July 2016, updated the BRs to remove the old
ETSI criteria (ETSI TS 101 456 V1.4.3 or ETSI TS 102 042 V2.3.1) and add
the new ones (ETSI EN 319 411-1 v1.1.1 or ETSI EN 319 411-2 v2.1.1).
This change was made in BRs v.1.3.6. However, no dates were associated
with the change.
Mozilla CA Policy 2.3 (about to be published) permits either set of
criteria to be used.
By what date would it be reasonable for Mozilla to require that all new
ETSI audits use the new criteria?
Inigo says that eIDAS (which, of course, refers only to the issuance of
Qualified certificates) have specified July 2017 as the end date for the
old criteria. Would that be a reasonable choice?
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20161128/20918d66/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list