[cabfpub] General WebPKI requirements

[Gervase Markham]

On 21/11/16 18:54, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> It's unclear what you mean. Do you think they should be incorporated?
> Given that the WG was shuttered without producing conclusive output, and
> given that the AD-sponsored drafts that continued on have themselves had
> a number of issues, it seems unlikely that they should be used as inputs. 

I merely meant to say that perhaps they did produce something useful,
but I haven't read any of it. You clearly think they didn't; fair enough :-)

Gerv