[cabfpub] Draft CAA motion (2)

Doug Beattie doug.beattie at globalsign.com
Mon Nov 14 21:09:56 UTC 2016


You sent out a draft ballot, received a bunch of comments, listed some updates you "agreed to", got more comments, and on and on.  Would you be able to send out an updated ballot which incorporates the comments you're received and which you feel comfortable accepting so we can continue the dialogue against a new baseline - "Draft CAA motion (3)"?  

We're getting closer - is the only remaining discussion topic for allowing CAs to skip CAA "at time of  issuance" in certain cases when certain criteria are met?


-----Original Message-----
From: Public [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham via Public
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 9:44 AM
To: Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public at cabforum.org>
Cc: Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Draft CAA motion (2)

On 11/11/16 14:39, Peter Bowen wrote:
> A small correction.  I do not believe that Amazon (as a domain registrant) has stated that we will use CAA.

Apologies. I should have said that Amazon have indicated that they had some problems which CAA, used in this way and deployed universally, would solve. Is that fair? :-)

Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org

More information about the Public mailing list