[cabfpub] Draft CAA motion

[Ryan Sleevi]

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:

>
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 11:17 AM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:
>>
>> Even if we ignore WebTrust, what is the path to revert the change if
>> evidence is shown it is causing harm?
>>
>
> A ballot? :)
>
>
> My question was more what evidence will Google accept that it should be
> reverted?
>

Doesn't that depend on the situation and the ballot? And what the broader
Forum feels in its discussion of the issue? Hasn't the SHA-1 exception
procedure showed that with additional data, people can make informed
decisions that weigh the tradeoffs? Or with the EV for onion discussions
that we can find technical solutions that balance the concerns while allow
for greater flexibility?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20161109/1409fd11/attachment-0003.html>