[cabfpub] Draft CAA motion

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Wed Nov 9 19:17:46 UTC 2016

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Peter Bowen <pzb at amzn.com> wrote:

> Ryan,
> If we adopt CAA hard-fail only, and it does become a problem, what is the
> path to correct, given the current WebTrust cycle?  At it stands, I expect
> it to take years to correct if it makes it into a WebTrust criteria set.

Hasn't this been addressed every time we loosen requirements? This was
discussed at the Scottsdale F2F, being that the auditors are following the
activity in the Forum, and given that the CP/CPS of member CAs is required
and defined to incorporate the latest BRs - and in the event of conflict,
the BRs supersede.

> Even if we ignore WebTrust, what is the path to revert the change if
> evidence is shown it is causing harm?

A ballot? :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20161109/4afe3f38/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list