[cabfpub] Technically Constrained SubCAs
jimmy at it.auth.gr
Wed May 11 05:36:04 UTC 2016
The BRs in section 7.1.5 state:
" For a Subordinate CA Certificate to be considered Technically
Constrained, the certificate MUST include an Extended Key Usage (EKU)
extension specifying all extended key usages that the Subordinate CA
Certificate is authorized to issue certificates for. The
anyExtendedKeyUsage KeyPurposeId MUST NOT appear within this extension".
And then, it goes on about describing the Name Constraints extension
when the id-kp-serverAuth EKU is used.
It is clear that if an Intermediate CA Certificate has an EKU, limiting
the scope to "id-kp-emailProtection", it is technically constrained as
far as the SSL certificates are concerned and there is no need for an
additional Name Constraints extension.
The same applies for an Intermediate CA Certificate that either:
* includes the "id-kp-serverAuth" EKU
* includes the "anyExtendedKeyUsage"
* does not include an EKU
AND includes the nameConstraints extension with constraints on dNSName,
iPAddress and DirectoryName. My point is that, if an Intermediate CA
includes the nameConstraints extension with these constraints, the EKU
requirement should not be a mandatory requirement. Is there any other
reason why the EKU is currently a MUST requirement for SSL certificates?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Public