[cabfpub] IPR Exclusion notices
Dean_Coclin at symantec.com
Tue May 3 10:11:17 MST 2016
I think you make my point by using the word, "seems" in front of both
conclusions that you draw. Why force participants to draw inexact conclusions
when we can easily fix this with a ballot. Otherwise, you are left with
forcing members to determine if the exclusion was valid or not when it should
be clear and transparent.
I'm actually surprised that our IPR policy, given past and numerous
discussions about making all things CA/B Forum public, only says that the
exclusion notice has to be provided to the Chair. Am I the only one amazed by
that? Am I misinterpreting something?
From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv at mozilla.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:36 PM
To: Dean Coclin <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com>; CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] IPR Exclusion notices
On 03/05/16 16:50, Dean Coclin wrote:
> As discussed on last week's call, there appears to have been some
> ambiguity in the instructions to organizations that wanted to provide
> an exclusion notice in accordance with the latest IPR policy. The
> ballot stated that this had to be done within 60 days in accordance
> with the policy but the policy said that notice had to be provided to
> the CA/B Forum chair and not to the public list or anywhere else as we've
> done in the past.
That doesn't seem very ambiguous. It may not be transparent, but it's not
> For example, it was
> mentioned that one company posted their exclusion notice to the wiki
> but did not notify the Chair. Is this acceptable?
Notification was not provided to the chair, as requested, so that seems not
> Another organization notified the
> chair by the deadline (the chair did not post it until after the deadline).
Notification was provided to the chair, as requested, so that seems
> And we never sent a formal reminder out prior to the deadline.
Perhaps unfortunate, but again, not ambiguous. Isn't the reason we all have
highly paid lawyers is that they get to keep track of these things and make
sure the correct and complete legal notices get filed in the correct places by
the relevant deadlines?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 5747 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160503/0df75f51/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the Public