[cabfpub] Formation of Governance Review Working Group

[Dimitris Zacharopoulos]

Harica votes "yes" for ballot 165.

Dimitris Zacharopoulos.


On 17/3/2016 8:43 μμ, Dean Coclin wrote:
>
> Ballot 165 - Formation of Governance Review Working Group
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Dean Coclin of Symantec and 
> endorsed by Robin Alden of Comodo and Kirk Hall of Trend Micro:
>
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
>
> In accordance with Section 5.3 of the CA/B Forum Bylaws, the 
> chartering of a new working group by ballot is required. This Ballot 
> proposes chartering of the Governance Review Working Group. The 
> Working Group’s charter will be as follows:
>
> 1. Consider revisions to the scope of the Forum to include possible 
> additional topics such as code signing, SMIME and client certificate 
> usages
>
> 2. Review the scope of the IPR and IP ownership issues
>
> 3. Consider options for representation of others in forum issues
>
> 4. Review voting rules and rights
>
> 5. Review admin functions
>
> 6. Examine making the forum an “official” organization (e.g. 
> Incorporation)
>
> 7. Review how requirements and guideline documents would be structured 
> in a newly organized forum would be done
>
> The group’s deliverables will be:
>
> 1. An extensive report with one or more proposals on possible changes 
> to the Forum organization (“proposed structure”)
>
> 2. A proposal on requirements and guideline document structure and 
> proprietorship
>
> 3. A form of ballot or ballots to implement any recommendations
>
> The Working Group shall expire once the deliverables have been completed.
>
> -- MOTION ENDS –
>
> The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on 17 
> March 2016, and will close at 2200 UTC on 24 March 2016. Unless the 
> motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will 
> start immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on 31 March 
> 2016. Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.
>
> A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the 
> response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A 
> vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. 
> Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from 
> any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting 
> period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: 
> https://cabforum.org/members/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160328/9d7effb9/attachment-0003.html>