[cabfpub] Formation of Governance Review Working Group

[Ryan Sleevi]

Google votes YES.
On Mar 17, 2016 11:43 AM, "Dean Coclin" <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com> wrote:

>
>
> Ballot 165 - Formation of Governance Review Working Group
>
> The following motion has been proposed by Dean Coclin of Symantec and
> endorsed by Robin Alden of Comodo and Kirk Hall of Trend Micro:
>
> -- MOTION BEGINS --
>
> In accordance with Section 5.3 of the CA/B Forum Bylaws, the chartering of
> a new working group by ballot is required. This Ballot proposes chartering
> of the Governance Review Working Group. The Working Group’s charter will be
> as follows:
>
> 1. Consider revisions to the scope of the Forum to include possible
> additional topics such as code signing, SMIME and client certificate usages
>
> 2. Review the scope of the IPR and IP ownership issues
>
> 3. Consider options for representation of others in forum issues
>
> 4. Review voting rules and rights
>
> 5. Review admin functions
>
> 6. Examine making the forum an “official” organization (e.g.
> Incorporation)
>
> 7. Review how requirements and guideline documents would be structured in
> a newly organized forum would be done
>
> The group’s deliverables will be:
>
> 1. An extensive report with one or more proposals on possible changes to
> the Forum organization (“proposed structure”)
>
> 2. A proposal on requirements and guideline document structure and
> proprietorship
>
> 3. A form of ballot or ballots to implement any recommendations
>
> The Working Group shall expire once the deliverables have been completed.
>
> -- MOTION ENDS –
>
>
>
> The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on 17 March
> 2016, and will close at 2200 UTC on 24 March 2016. Unless the motion is
> withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start
> immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on 31 March 2016. Votes
> must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.
>
> A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response.
> A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to
> abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses
> will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a
> voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting
> members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160325/be63be18/attachment.html