[cabfpub] [cabfman] Ballot 171? for updating the ETSI standards in the CABF documents

Mon Jun 13 13:13:45 UTC 2016

Bonjour,

More on this subject.

102042 is not yet abandoned, it hasn’t even officially been replaced by 319411-1 yet, it seems premature to remove any reference to 102042.
What is missing in Europe is a delegated act to impose 319411. The only official change I see is from TS 119403 to EN 319403.

It may be possible for a CA to be TS 102042-audited for web server certificates after July 1st 2016. Even in Europe.

Cordialement,
Erwann Abalea

Le 9 juin 2016 à 08:36, Barreira Iglesias, Iñigo <i-barreira at izenpe.eus<mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.eus>> a écrit :

Yes, the effective date for these new audits is to start on july 1st 2016, the audist performed against TS before that date remains valid for one year until july 1st 2017.

Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.eus<mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.eus>
945067705

<image001.jpg>

ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna. KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

De: Erwann Abalea [mailto:Erwann.Abalea at docusign.com]
Enviado el: miércoles, 08 de junio de 2016 15:38
Para: Barreira Iglesias, Iñigo
CC: management at cabforum.org<mailto:management at cabforum.org>
Asunto: Re: [cabfman] Ballot 171? for updating the ETSI standards in the CABF documents

Bonjour,

There’s a one year transition period where a CA can have an ETSI 102042 audit performed less than one year ago. If the proposed ballot passes, would such a CA be still eligible?

Cordialement,
Erwann Abalea

Le 8 juin 2016 à 14:37, Barreira Iglesias, Iñigo <i-barreira at izenpe.eus<mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.eus>> a écrit :

Ballot 171 – Updating the ETSI standards in the CABF documents
The following motion has been proposed by Iñigo Barreira of Izenpe and endorsed by XXX and XXX:
-- MOTION BEGINS –
In the BRs,
In section 1.6.3 References, change:
ETSI TS 119 403, Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Trust Service Provider Conformity Assessment ‐ General Requirements and Guidance.
ETSI TS 102 042, Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy requirements for certification authorities issuing public key certificates.
With
ETSI EN 319 403, Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Trust Service Provider Conformity Assessment - Requirements for conformity assessment bodies assessing Trust Service Providers

ETSI EN 319 411-1, Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy and security requirements for Trust Service Providers issuing certificates;
Part 1: General requirements

ETSI EN 319 411-2, Electronic Signatures and Infrastructures (ESI); Policy and security requirements for Trust Service Providers issuing certificates;
Part 2: Requirements for trust service providers issuing EU qualified certificates
In section 8.2 Identity/qualification of assessor, point 4, change:
4. (For audits conducted in accordance with any one of the ETSI standards) accredited in accordance with ETSI TS 119 403, or accredited to conduct such audits under an equivalent national scheme, or accredited by a national accreditation body in line with ISO 27006 to carry out ISO 27001 audits;

With

4. (For audits conducted in accordance with any one of the ETSI standards) accredited in accordance with ETSI EN 319 403;

In section 8.4 Topics covered by assessment, point 2, change:
2. A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042;
With
2. A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI EN 319 411-1;
In the EV guidelines,

In section 8.2.1 Implementation, point (B), change:

(B)  Implement the requirements of (i) the then-current WebTrust Program for CAs, and (ii) the then-current WebTrust
EV Program or ETSI TS 102 042; and

With

(B)  Implement the requirements of (i) the then-current WebTrust Program for CAs, and (ii) the then-current WebTrust
EV Program or ETSI EN 319 411-1 for EVCP policy or ETSI EN 319 411-2 for QCP-w policy; and

In section 8.2.2 Disclosure, change:

The CA is also REQUIRED to publicly disclose its CA business practices as required by both WebTrust for CAs and ETSI TS 102 042.

With

The CA is also REQUIRED to publicly disclose its CA business practices as required by both WebTrust for CAs and ETSI EN 319 411-1 or ETSI EN 319 411-2.

In section 17.1 Eligible audit schemes, point (ii), change:

(ii) ETSI TS 102 042 audit

With

(ii) ETSI EN 319 411-1 audit for EVCP policy or ETSI EN 319 411-2 audit for QCP-w policy

In section 17.4 pre-issuance readiness audit, point (2), change:

(2) If the CA has a currently valid ETSI 102 042 audit, then, before issuing EV Certificates, the CA and its Root CA MUST
successfully complete a point-in-time readiness assessment audit against ETSI TS 102 042.

With

(2) If the CA has a currently valid ETSI EN 319 411-1 audit for EVCP policy or ETSI EN 319 411-2 for QCP-w policy, then, before issuing EV Certificates, the CA and its Root CA MUST successfully complete a point-in-time readiness assessment audit against these ETSI standards.

In section 17.4 pre-issuance readiness audit, point (3), change:

(3) If the CA does not have a currently valid WebTrust Seal of Assurance for CAs or an ETSI 102 042 audit, then, before
issuing EV Certificates, the CA and its Root CA MUST successfully complete either: (i) a point-in-time readiness
assessment audit against the WebTrust for CA Program, or (ii) a point-in-time readiness assessment audit against the
WebTrust EV Program, or an ETSI TS 102 042 audit.

With

(3) If the CA does not have a currently valid WebTrust Seal of Assurance for CAs or an ETSI EN 319 411-1 audit for EVCP policy or ETSI EN 319 411-2 for QCP-w policy, then, before issuing EV Certificates, the CA and its Root CA MUST successfully complete either: (i) a point-in-time readiness assessment audit against the WebTrust for CA Program, or (ii) a point-in-time readiness assessment audit against the WebTrust EV Program, or an ETSI EN 319 411-1 for EVCP or ETSI EN 319 411-2 for QCP-w audit.
-- MOTION ENDS --
The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on 13 June 2016, and will close at 2200 UTC on 20 June 2016. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on 26 June 2016. Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.
A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/
In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is currently ten (10) members– at least ten members must participate in the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.

Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.eus<mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.eus>
945067705

<image001.jpg>

ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna. KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

_______________________________________________
Management mailing list
Management at cabforum.org<mailto:Management at cabforum.org>
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/management

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160613/124a6e3b/attachment-0002.html>