[cabfpub] Ballot 170 voting results

[Dean Coclin]

Yes, I had put a slot on this week's agenda to try and come to some agreement 
on this although the total time allotted probably won't suffice. But at least 
we can kick off a discussion. In addition, I would suggest that Ben invite 
some of the folks that voted NO to join the next PWG call next week and 
solicit their feedback.

Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv at mozilla.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 10:42 AM
To: Dean Coclin <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com>; CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 170 voting results

On 17/06/16 19:45, Dean Coclin wrote:
> From the CAs, we received 11 YES votes, 0 NO votes and 1 Abstention
>
> From the Browsers, we received 2 YES votes, 2 NO votes and 0 Abstentions.
>
> Therefore the ballot fails.

I'm sure this must be frustrating for those in the Policy Group who have 
worked on this ballot. Therefore, I do think we need to figure out some way to 
come to an agreement on the general scope of the BRs before more work is done, 
to avoid this outcome in future. Dean: as chair, do you have suggestions for 
the best way to have that discussion?

Gerv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5723 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160621/7112af26/attachment-0001.bin