[cabfpub] F2F Topic details: What should be represented in the "O" field?

[Dean Coclin]

And here is a summary of the discussions up to now on this topic. For our
discussion Thursday. Peter will also be presenting remotely.


Dean

 

From: Peter Bowen [mailto:pzb at amzn.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 2:49 PM
To: Doug Beattie <doug.beattie at globalsign.com>
Cc: Dean Coclin <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com>; CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] F2F Topic details: What should be represented in the
"O" field?

 

Doug,

 

I think those are both relevant questions.  The relationship between
applicant and FQDN and subject and FQDN are related by separate topics.  See
the attached summary of some of the dependencies.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160215/c7706c11/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: What should be in the O field.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 295438 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160215/c7706c11/attachment-0003.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5747 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160215/c7706c11/attachment-0001.p7s>