[cabfpub] Ballot 169 Results

[Ryan Sleevi]

Does this represent the formal call for exclusions?

On Aug 7, 2016 11:48 AM, "Dean Coclin" <Dean_Coclin at symantec.com> wrote:

> Voting on Ballot 169, Revised Validation Requirements, has ended. Here are
> the results:
>
>
>
> From the CAs, we received 19 YES votes, 0 NO votes and 0 Abstentions
>
>
>
> From the Browsers, we received 3 YES votes, 0 NO votes and 0 Abstentions
>
>
>
> Therefore, the ballot passes unanimously.
>
>
>
> A big thank you to the validation working group for all your efforts in
> working through the issues and developing a ballot which met everyone’s
> expectations. The results are indicative of the time you took to address
> comments from the group.
>
>
>
> This ballot has an effective date of March 1, 2017.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dean Coclin
>
> CA/B Forum Chair
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160807/67579fbd/attachment-0003.html>