[cabfpub] Issuers in BR/EV/EVCS Guideline Scope
pzb at amzn.com
Mon Apr 18 18:23:52 UTC 2016
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:16 AM, kirk_hall at trendmicro.com wrote:
> I don’t understand your comment about stalling – in fact, I don’t even understand why we need this ballot now.
> Peter, is there some pressing need for us to consider your ballot at this time? To be blunt, it’s pretty abstract, and I’m not sure I understand it all (or where it came from). Why do we need this general statement?
I was not proposing any ballot at this time. I’m trying to get a sense whether there is any general agreement of scope rather than negotiate with each trust store. We know that Mozilla is working to update their policies, Microsoft is continually refining theirs, and I suspect several other major trust stores are also working on new/revised policies, so it is my preference to get alignment from all ahead of those changes.
The alternative is to have each trust store maintainer define their own independent policy then attempt to comply with the disparate policies and cajole the maintainers to modify their policies to make concurrent compliance practical.
More information about the Public