[cabfpub] Proposed new ballot on IP Addresses in SANs

[Jeremy Rowley]

We have and it's not practical. I'm encouraging the customers with the issue to post to the forum to explain why.


Richard Barnes <rbarnes at mozilla.com> wrote:

Jody, Rick: Have you guys evaluated Ryan's proposed solution?  It seems a bit rash to be changing the BRs if there are compliant options that work.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Jody Cloutier <jodycl at microsoft.com<mailto:jodycl at microsoft.com>> wrote:

As a Forum member, Google is certainly within its purview to vote no, then. Let's put it to a vote and see where it comes down.

________________________________
From: Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com<mailto:sleevi at google.com>>
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 6:24:55 AM
To: Jody Cloutier
Cc: Richard Barnes; Rick Andrews; public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Proposed new ballot on IP Addresses in SANs



On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 6:24 AM, Jody Cloutier <jodycl at microsoft.com<mailto:jodycl at microsoft.com>> wrote:

Simple - because we have customers who now need the functionality, and without this change we cannot give it to them.

That's not correct - I gave a solution 8 months ago, fully compliant with the BRs, that would have allowed that behaviour to be given to them.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20160421/8345685f/attachment.html