[cabfpub] Short-Lived Certificate Ballot

Bruce Morton bruce.morton at entrust.com
Fri Oct 30 16:25:28 UTC 2015

I agree. I can bring this up after Ballot 153 closes.


From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 12:18 PM
To: Bruce Morton <bruce.morton at entrust.com>
Cc: Jeremy Rowley <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Short-Lived Certificate Ballot

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:19 AM, Bruce Morton <bruce.morton at entrust.com<mailto:bruce.morton at entrust.com>> wrote:
Should we take the opportunity to define this notBefore time for all certificates? If that would make the ballot too cumbersome, then perhaps we should address this issue for a separate ballot.

I think it'd make sense for a separate ballot. I think it's a fine idea and would happy to support something with a little wordsmithing, but given that the concerns may and probably are different (e.g. those not interested in short-lived certificates will be affected by such a ballot), so it may help to separate out the discussion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20151030/9b7e81ce/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list