[cabfpub] Discussion leaders: please provide summaries for yoursessions

"Barreira Iglesias, Iñigo" i-barreira at izenpe.net
Fri Oct 2 07:44:04 UTC 2015

Added mine.

Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.net

ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna. KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] En nombre de Dean Coclin
Enviado el: viernes, 02 de octubre de 2015 9:08
Para: Gervase Markham; CABFPub
Asunto: Re: [cabfpub] Discussion leaders: please provide summaries for yoursessions

I've edited the page to add some short comments. Would be helpful if others can review and add theirs. 

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 2:35 PM
Subject: [cabfpub] Discussion leaders: please provide summaries for your sessions

Following on from the discussion on the private list: I'd like to request that everyone who is listed as a Discussion Leader for a discussion session in the draft agenda here:


please edit the wiki page to add a summary of what you hope to achieve from your session. That is, please explain the goal (or goals, if there are multiple possibilities) you are hoping to reach. You may also want to add references to documents or previous discussions which relate to the topic.
It probably makes most sense to add any information to the "Discussion Leader / Notes" column.

My hope is that this will help everyone prepare for the discussion, and hopefully avoid us spending the time rehashing the same issues that we've discussed in the past, instead of breaking new ground.

As far as I can see, the people this would particularly concern are:

  Short Lived certificates
  Domain Validation
  Document merging: EV and BRs?

  Cert validity periods

  EV Wildcards

  Document management/Github
  Document merging: EV and BRs?

Also, if the Working Groups have their own agendas for the Tuesday slots, could those agendas make it to the wiki also? That again would be a job for our intrepid discussion leaders Ben, Jeremy, Kirk, and Dean.

Thanks everyone :-)

Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org

More information about the Public mailing list