[cabfpub] Notice of Requested Disclosure re: BR § 3.2.2.4

[Enric Castillo]

ANF AC do not own any patent to declare.

ANF Autoridad de Certificación

*Enric Castillo*
Director Técnico
+34 626818285
Gran Via de Les Corts Catalanes 996, Barcelona
+593 0 996483798
12 de Octubre y Cordero, World Trade Center, Torre A, 1102, Quito
ANF Autoridad de Certificación
www.anf.es <https://www.anf.es>

*Aviso*

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario y puede contener 
información privilegiada o confidencial y/o datos de carácter personal, 
cuya difusión está regulada por la Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos y 
la Ley de Servicios de la Sociedad de la Información. Si usted no es el 
destinatario indicado (o el responsable de la entrega al mismo), no debe 
copiar o entregar este mensaje a terceros bajo ningún concepto. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error o lo ha conseguido por otros medios, le 
rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda 
a su eliminación irreversible. Las opiniones, conclusiones y demás 
informaciones incluidas en este mensaje que no estén relacionadas con 
asuntos profesionales de ANF Autoridad de Certificación no están 
respaldadas por la empresa.

El 30/10/2015 a las 12:03, Ben Wilson escribió:
>
> Dear Forum Member,
>
> On September 18, the  CA/B Forum Patent Advisory Group announced that 
> we were requesting all Forum members to disclose patents or patent 
> applications related to domain validation methods, as discussed in the 
> original email below.  This is just a reminder that the deadline for 
> such responses is tomorrow, October 31.
>
> Sincerely yours,
>
> Be Wilson, PAG Chair
>
> *From:*public-bounces at cabforum.org 
> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson
> *Sent:* Friday, September 18, 2015 5:23 PM
> *To:* CABFPub <public at cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* [cabfpub] Notice of Requested Disclosure re: BR § 3.2.2.4
> *Importance:* High
>
> Dear Forum Member,
>
> The Patent Advisory Group has approved the following Notice of 
> Requested Disclosure re: BR § 3.2.2.4 for distribution to CA/Browser 
> Forum membership:
>
> The CA/Browser Forum Intellectual Property Rights Policy includes the 
> following:
>
>
> “2. Licensing and Disclosure Goals for CAB Forum Guidelines: In order 
> to promote the widest adoption of CAB Forum Guidelines, CAB Forum 
> seeks to issue Guidelines that can be implemented on a Royalty-Free 
> (RF) basis subject to the conditions of this policy. CAB Forum will 
> ordinarily not approve a Guideline if it is aware that Essential 
> Claims exist which are not available on RF terms. CAB Forum Members 
> are encouraged to bring to the attention of the CAB Forum any known 
> patent or pending patent application of other organizations that might 
> contain Essential Claims.”
>
> In light of that goal, to better evaluate whether the list of 
> alternative methods for performing domain-control validation in BR § 
> 3.2.2.4 is adequate, in light of the Forum’s IPR Policy, and to 
> provide guidance to those who will look to the Forum’s guidelines 
> while seeking to comply on a royalty-free basis:
>
> (1)All CAB Forum Members should disclose any patent or patent 
> application that the Member or its Affiliates owns and any that it or 
> its Affiliates has the right to license without obligation of payment 
> or other consideration to an unrelated third party that would contain 
> Essential Claims with respect to any existing or proposed method for 
> domain validation currently listed in or proposed for BR § 3.2.2.4, if 
> such method were the only way to fulfill the BR § 3.2.2.4 requirement.
>
> (2)In so disclosing, it is also requested that the Member also 
> identify to which of the methods in the existing or proposed BR § 
> 3.2.2.4 the patent(s) would have Essential Claims.
>
> (3)Please respond on or before October 31, 2015.
>
> In other words, the Forum is asking that Members disclose any patent 
> or patent application that contains a method of domain validation.  
> The PAG is concerned about the number of royalty-free methods 
> available.  The existing and proposed methods for BR § 3.2.2.4 are set 
> forth in an email to the Public list from Kirk Hall, dated 
> 10-Sept-2015 with a subject line of “[cabfpub] Final Domain Validation 
> Methods pre-ballot for Forum consideration”.
>
> Finally, the PAG will soon be circulating its summary of findings. 
>  Those findings are in line with this Request and include two major 
> recommendations: (1) modification of the definition of “Essential 
> Claim” and (2) greater specificity with patent claim disclosures. 
>   The findings will be discussed in further detail at the upcoming 
> face-to-face meeting in Istanbul.
>
> Thank you,
>
> CA/Browser Forum Patent Advisory Group
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20151030/7171b2ae/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logo-anf.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4746 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20151030/7171b2ae/attachment-0001.png