[cabfpub] Ballots 154 and 155 - Convert to RFC 3647 Framework and GitHub

[Dimitris Zacharopoulos]

HARICA votes YES for both ballots 154 and 155.



On 3/11/2015 9:46 μμ, Ben Wilson wrote:
>
> *Ballots 154 and 155 - Convert to RFC 3647 Framework* *and GitHub*
>
> The Certificate Policy Review Working Group was chartered by Ballot 
> 128 to (i) consider existing and proposed standards, (ii) create a 
> list of potential improvements based on the considered standards that 
> improve the existing CAB Forum work product, (iii) evaluate the 
> transition to a 3647 format based on the amount of work involved.
>
> The CP Review WG has met and concluded that the best path forward for 
> the Forum is to complete a conversion to the RFC 3647 framework for 
> the EV Guidelines and the Network and Certificate System Security 
> Requirements and to post them on GitHub as the canonical versions of 
> those documents.
>
> Ben Wilson of DigiCert makes the following motions, and Dean Coclin 
> from Symantec and Gerv Markham from Mozilla have endorsed them.
>
> *- - - - Motion for Ballot 154 - - - -*
>
> Be it resolved that the CA / Browser Forum directs the Certificate 
> Policy Review Working Group to prepare a version of the EV Guidelines 
> that moves existing content into the RFC 3647 format;
>
> Be it further resolved that the CA / Browser Forum also directs the 
> Certificate Policy Review Working Group to post the RFC-3647-formatted 
> EV Guidelines on GitHub to serve, upon formal adoption by the Forum in 
> a future ballot, as the canonical version of the EV Guidelines.
>
> *- - - - Motion Ends - - - -*
>
> *- - - - Motion for Ballot 155 - - - -*
>
> Be it resolved that the CA / Browser Forum directs the Certificate 
> Policy Review Working Group to prepare a version of the Network and 
> Certificate System Security Requirements that moves existing content 
> into the RFC 3647 format;
>
> Be it further resolved that the CA / Browser Forum also directs the 
> Certificate Policy Review Working Group to post the RFC-3647-formatted 
> Network and Certificate System Security Requirements on GitHub to 
> serve, upon formal adoption by the Forum in a future ballot, as the 
> canonical version of the Network and Certificate System Security 
> Requirements.
>
> *- - - - Motion Ends* *- - - -*
>
> The review period for these ballots shall commence at 2200 UTC on 
> Tuesday, 3 November 2015 and will close at 2200 UTC on Tuesday, 10 
> November 2015. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review 
> period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will 
> close at 2200 UTC on Tuesday, 17 November 2015.
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread. A vote 
> in favor of each ballot must indicate a clear ‘yes’ in the response. A 
> vote against each ballot must indicate a clear ‘no’ in the response. A 
> vote to abstain must indicate a clear ‘abstain’ in the response. 
> Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from 
> any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting 
> period will be counted.
>
> Voting members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/. In 
> order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes 
> cast by members in the CA category and more than one half of the votes 
> cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is 
> currently nine (9) members– at least nine members must participate in 
> the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or by 
> abstaining for the vote to be valid.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20151116/b41104c4/attachment-0003.html>