[cabfpub] Ballots 154 and 155 - Convert to RFC 3647 Framework andGitHub

Fri Nov 13 08:24:48 UTC 2015

Hello,

Ballot 154 - Sertifitseerimiskeskus abstains
Ballot 155 - Sertifitseerimiskeskus votes YES

Best regards,

Eneli Kirme
AS Sertifitseerimiskeskus/ Certification Centre

On 13 Nov 2015, at 09:38, Volkan Nergiz <volkan.nergiz at turktrust.com.tr<mailto:volkan.nergiz at turktrust.com.tr>> wrote:

Hello,

TURKTRUST votes YES for Ballot 154
TURKTRUST votes YES for Ballot 155

Kindest Regards,

Volkan NERGİZ
Quality Management System Specialist

<image002.jpg>
TURKTRUST Information Security Services Inc.
Address: Hollanda Caddesi 696. Sokak No: 7 Yıldız, Çankaya 06550 – ANKARA
Phone: (312) 439 10 00 - 226 Fax: (312) 439 10 01
E-Mail: volkan.nergiz at turktrust.com.tr<mailto:volkan.nergiz at turktrust.com.tr>
Web: www.turktrust.com.tr<http://www.turktrust.com.tr/>

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of "Barreira Iglesias, Iñigo"
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 9:05 AM
To: Ben Wilson <ben.wilson at digicert.com<mailto:ben.wilson at digicert.com>>; CABFPub <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballots 154 and 155 - Convert to RFC 3647 Framework andGitHub

Izenpe votes yes to both ballots, 154 and 155.

Regards

Iñigo Barreira
Responsable del Área técnica
i-barreira at izenpe.eus<mailto:i-barreira at izenpe.eus>
945067705

<image003.jpg>

ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna. KONTUZ!
ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se pusiese en contacto con el remitente.

De: public-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] En nombre de Ben Wilson
Enviado el: jueves, 12 de noviembre de 2015 17:03
Para: CABFPub
Asunto: Re: [cabfpub] Ballots 154 and 155 - Convert to RFC 3647 Framework andGitHub

Ballot 154 – DigiCert votes Yes
Ballot 155 – DigiCert votes Yes

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 12:46 PM
To: CABFPub <public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>>
Subject: [cabfpub] Ballots 154 and 155 - Convert to RFC 3647 Framework and GitHub

Ballots 154 and 155 - Convert to RFC 3647 Framework and GitHub

The Certificate Policy Review Working Group was chartered by Ballot 128 to (i) consider existing and proposed standards, (ii) create a list of potential improvements based on the considered standards that improve the existing CAB Forum work product, (iii) evaluate the transition to a 3647 format based on the amount of work involved.

The CP Review WG has met and concluded that the best path forward for the Forum is to complete a conversion to the RFC 3647 framework for the EV Guidelines and the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements and to post them on GitHub as the canonical versions of those documents.

Ben Wilson of DigiCert makes the following motions, and Dean Coclin from Symantec and Gerv Markham from Mozilla have endorsed them.

- - - - Motion for Ballot 154 - - - -

Be it resolved that the CA / Browser Forum directs the Certificate Policy Review Working Group to prepare a version of the EV Guidelines that moves existing content into the RFC 3647 format;

Be it further resolved that the CA / Browser Forum also directs the Certificate Policy Review Working Group to post the RFC-3647-formatted EV Guidelines on GitHub to serve, upon formal adoption by the Forum in a future ballot, as the canonical version of the EV Guidelines.

- - - - Motion Ends - - - -

- - - - Motion for Ballot 155 - - - -

Be it resolved that the CA / Browser Forum directs the Certificate Policy Review Working Group to prepare a version of the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements that moves existing content into the RFC 3647 format;

Be it further resolved that the CA / Browser Forum also directs the Certificate Policy Review Working Group to post the RFC-3647-formatted Network and Certificate System Security Requirements on GitHub to serve, upon formal adoption by the Forum in a future ballot, as the canonical version of the Network and Certificate System Security Requirements.

- - - - Motion Ends - - - -

The review period for these ballots shall commence at 2200 UTC on Tuesday, 3 November 2015 and will close at 2200 UTC on Tuesday, 10 November 2015. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on Tuesday, 17 November 2015.

Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread. A vote in favor of each ballot must indicate a clear ‘yes’ in the response. A vote against each ballot must indicate a clear ‘no’ in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear ‘abstain’ in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted.

Voting members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/. In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and more than one half of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is currently nine (9) members– at least nine members must participate in the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or by abstaining for the vote to be valid.

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org<mailto:Public at cabforum.org>
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20151113/00164b46/attachment-0003.html>