[cabfpub] FW: Extension of period allowing .onion certificates

[Ryan Sleevi]

Agreed that I don't believe a ballot is necessary to extend or permit
anything. We could put forth a ballot to clear up the language, but that
would have no change on the functional issuance of such certificates, which
are permitted under the current BRs indefinitely now that status has been
granted.

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Gervase Markham <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:

> On 22/11/15 21:08, kirk_hall at trendmicro.com wrote:
> > Is this sufficient reason to authorize .onion permanently?
>
> I didn't realise the authorization wasn't permanent; I thought it was
> permanent conditional on IESG approval, which we now have. If that's not
> the case, we should fix that, yes :-)
>
> Gerv
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20151123/21b87efc/attachment.html