[cabfpub] Ballot 146 - Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC 3647 Framework

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Thu Mar 19 22:35:20 UTC 2015

Thanks for continuing to push on this, Ben.

>From our point of view, this is a huge change. It's probably a good one (as
discussed during the F2F, this could be tremendously helpful). But it's
going to take a lot of careful review for us to cross-check the CP Review
WG's work, in part because I can't seem to find public archives that might
be able to answer questions.

Because of this, I'm not sure if we'll be able to complete the review by
the time the ballot closes. If that happens, we may decide to vote against
it, simply on the "needs more time", even though, as discussed during the
F2F, I think we'd be quite supportive of this effort (having reviewed
several CA's CP/CPS this week, I certainly found myself using the draft as
a helpful crib sheet).

Since we haven't really looked closely at this until the discussions at the
most recent F2F, would you and the cosponsors be willing to delay starting
this ballot by a week (or two), and/or seek to extend the review period?
This is probably the single largest change the Forum has ever proposed, and
I want to make sure it gets the due attention it deserves, while also not
delaying it indefinitely for "more review".

Would that be something you would be OK with?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150319/12ed7fe8/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list