[cabfpub] Reposting material to the CABF Public list

Wayne Thayer wthayer at godaddy.com
Tue Mar 3 00:47:40 UTC 2015


When someone becomes a representative of a member company, I automatically add them to the Management, Questions, and Public lists.

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Dean Coclin
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 4:46 PM
To: kirk_hall at trendmicro.com; Ryan Sleevi
Cc: CABFPub (public at cabforum.org)
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Reposting material to the CABF Public list

That is what Wayne confirmed on last week’s call.
Dean

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org<mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of kirk_hall at trendmicro.com<mailto:kirk_hall at trendmicro.com>
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 6:39 PM
To: Ryan Sleevi
Cc: CABFPub (public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>)
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Reposting material to the CABF Public list

Not sure I understand your question.  I meant that messages sent to Questions@ automatically go to the Management (Members) list, which means all Members see the messages without filtering.  At least that’s my understanding – Adrien Johnson’s original message to the Forum on .onion domains was sent to the Questions@ mailbox and showed up in my CA-Browser Forum mailbox automatically, which I assume is the same for other Members.

From: Ryan Sleevi [mailto:sleevi at google.com]
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 2:36 PM
To: Kirk Hall (RD-US)
Cc: CABFPub (public at cabforum.org<mailto:public at cabforum.org>)
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Reposting material to the CABF Public list



On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:17 PM, kirk_hall at trendmicro.com<mailto:kirk_hall at trendmicro.com> <kirk_hall at trendmicro.com<mailto:kirk_hall at trendmicro.com>> wrote:
Here are all the relevant Bylaw sections I could find.

Hi Kirk,

While I appreciate the bylaws, that isn't quite what I meant. You made the statement that everyone sees it. However, when I joined the Forum, I was not explicitly added to the questions@ list and did not receive such feedback.

Now, perhaps the procedure has changed, and it is as you describe.

(On to more bylaw oddities, I'll simply note that 6.2 is not consistently followed either)



TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE

The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential

and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection.

If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or

disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or

telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150303/a7e3c0e8/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Public mailing list