[cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 146 - Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC 3647 Framework

[Gervase Markham]

On 24/02/15 16:59, Dean Coclin wrote:
> Some of the beneficiaries are Browser root programs and relying parties.
> Having the BRs in this format makes it easier for Jody, Kathleen and
> others to review CPS’ and compare to the sections in the BRs for
> compliance.  

I checked with Kathleen about this; she said:

"This is not something I asked for. I suspect that whoever asked for it
thought that it would be nice for the BRs to line up with the way most
CP/CPS documents are organized. But, it doesn't really matter to me.

If they change the ordering and the section numbering of the BRs, then I
will have to update Mozilla's CA Certificate Policy and a bunch of wiki
pages. So, it would be extra busy work for me."

So Mozilla is not against this change if other stakeholders see strong
value in it, but we are not requesting it for ourselves.

Gerv