[cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 146 - Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC 3647 Framework
Dean_Coclin at symantec.com
Sat Mar 14 17:18:06 MST 2015
We'll take this feedback into account in the working group. Good discussion
this week. THANKS to all.
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On
Behalf Of Gervase Markham
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 7:37 PM
To: Ryan Sleevi; Ben Wilson
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 146 - Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC
On 10/03/15 22:50, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2015 10:43 PM, "Ben Wilson" <ben.wilson at digicert.com
> <mailto:ben.wilson at digicert.com>> wrote:
>> I forgot to mention. The current plan is to adopt these, then add in
> the EV Guidelines for SSL, and then add in the Network Security
> requirements, and then code signing, ETSI/NIST language, etc. A
> benefit of this plan is a reduction in the number of documents we have to
> I am at a loss to understand why that is at all a good thing.
Yes, this seems surprising to me too. Reformatting the BRs in another format
is one thing; combining all the CABF documents into a single document is
quite another. The former, we'll go along with if others want it. The
Multiple documents is a feature when you are addressing multiple audiences.
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 6130 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150314/797a8395/attachment.bin
More information about the Public