[cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 146 - Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC 3647 Framework

Eddy Nigg eddy_nigg at startcom.org
Tue Feb 24 18:30:54 UTC 2015


On 02/24/2015 08:13 PM, kirk_hall at trendmicro.com wrote:
> One other consideration -- there are many parts of the BRs (and EVGLs) 
> that are not included in or relevant to a CA's CPS -- they are either 
> requirements, technical standards, or prohibitions, but they don't 
> have to be declared or included in a CPS.  So in that sense, putting 
> the BRs into RFC 3647 does not aid in review or comparison of CPSs 
> across CAs, at least as to those sections...

How about the BR in addition to a RFC 3647 structured document stating 
the relevant BR requirements? Meaning, two documents.

-- 
Regards
Signer: 	Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
	StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: 	startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: 	Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: 	Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150224/8af3014f/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4313 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150224/8af3014f/attachment-0001.p7s>


More information about the Public mailing list