[cabfpub] Pre-Ballot 146 - Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC 3647 Framework
Eddy Nigg
eddy_nigg at startcom.org
Tue Feb 24 18:30:54 UTC 2015
On 02/24/2015 08:13 PM, kirk_hall at trendmicro.com wrote:
> One other consideration -- there are many parts of the BRs (and EVGLs)
> that are not included in or relevant to a CA's CPS -- they are either
> requirements, technical standards, or prohibitions, but they don't
> have to be declared or included in a CPS. So in that sense, putting
> the BRs into RFC 3647 does not aid in review or comparison of CPSs
> across CAs, at least as to those sections...
How about the BR in addition to a RFC 3647 structured document stating
the relevant BR requirements? Meaning, two documents.
--
Regards
Signer: Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150224/8af3014f/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4313 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150224/8af3014f/attachment-0001.p7s>
More information about the Public
mailing list