[cabfpub] Small errors in the BRs

[Gervase Markham]

Hi everyone,

Kathleen has noticed a couple of errors in the BRs (1.3.0). I believe we
have provisions for editorial discretion - is it OK for Ben or someone
to fix them using that power? Details below.

Gerv

==
"7.1.4.2.1. Subject Alternative Name Extension
Required/Optional: Required"

It's missing the line "Certificate Field: extensions:subjectAltName"
==

and

==
"7.1.4.2.2. Subject Distinguished Name Fields
a. Certificate Field: subject:commonName (OID 2.5.4.3)
Required/Optional: Deprecated (Discouraged, but not prohibited)
Contents: If present, this field MUST contain a single IP address or
Fully‐Qualified Domain
Name that is one of the values contained in the Certificate’s
subjectAltName extension (see
Section 9.2.1)."

The 9.2.1 should be 7.1.4.2.1
==