[cabfpub] **CAUTION: NOT SENT FROM OATI** Re: Ballot 146 - Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC 3647 Framework

[Erwann Abalea]

Bonjour Patrick,

The "**CAUTION: NOT SENT FROM OATI**" part is seen only on your side, 
probably added by your local mail server on the mail sent by you coming 
from the list server.

-- 
Erwann ABALEA

Le 13/04/2015 22:58, Patrick Tronnier a écrit :
>
> Please ignore “**CAUTION: NOT SENT FROM OATI**” as my email was 
> falsely flagged. Thanks.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Patrick Tronnier
>
> Principal Security Architect &
>
> Sr. Director of Quality Assurance & Customer Support
>
> Phone: 763.201.2000
>
> Fax: 763.201.5333
>
> Direct Line: 763.201.2052
>
> Open Access Technology International, Inc.
>
> 3660 Technology Drive NE, Minneapolis, MN 55418
>
> “Human action can be modified to some extent, but human nature cannot 
> be changed.” – Abraham Lincoln
>
> CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: This email and any attachment(s) contain 
> confidential and/or proprietary information of Open Access Technology 
> International, Inc. Do not copy or distribute without the prior 
> written consent of OATI. If you are not a named recipient to the 
> message, please notify the sender immediately and do not retain the 
> message in any form, printed or electronic.
>
> *From:*public-bounces at cabforum.org 
> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Patrick Tronnier
> *Sent:* Monday, April 13, 2015 4:47 PM
> *To:* Ben Wilson; CABFPub
> *Subject:* **CAUTION: NOT SENT FROM OATI** Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 146 - 
> Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC 3647 Framework
>
> Open Access Technology International (OATI) votes YES.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Patrick Tronnier
>
> Principal Security Architect &
>
> Sr. Director of Quality Assurance & Customer Support
>
> Phone: 763.201.2000
>
> Fax: 763.201.5333
>
> Direct Line: 763.201.2052
>
> Open Access Technology International, Inc.
>
> 3660 Technology Drive NE, Minneapolis, MN 55418
>
> “Human action can be modified to some extent, but human nature cannot 
> be changed.” – Abraham Lincoln
>
> CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: This email and any attachment(s) contain 
> confidential and/or proprietary information of Open Access Technology 
> International, Inc. Do not copy or distribute without the prior 
> written consent of OATI. If you are not a named recipient to the 
> message, please notify the sender immediately and do not retain the 
> message in any form, printed or electronic.
>
> *From:*public-bounces at cabforum.org 
> <mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org> 
> [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] *On Behalf Of *Ben Wilson
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 02, 2015 4:47 PM
> *To:* CABFPub
> *Subject:* [cabfpub] Ballot 146 - Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC 
> 3647 Framework
>
> Ballot 146 - Convert Baseline Requirements to RFC 3647 Framework
>
> The Certificate Policy Review Working Group was chartered by Ballot 
> 128 to (i) consider existing and proposed standards, (ii) create a 
> list of potential improvements based on the considered standards that 
> improve the existing CAB Forum work product, (iii) evaluate the 
> transition to a 3647 format based on the amount [of work involved]. 
> One deliverable of the CP Review WG was to propose a ballot to improve 
> CA infrastructure based on existing standards and documents and 
> recommend whether to finish the 3647 conversion presented by Jeremy 
> Rowley in January 2014.
>
> The CP Review WG has met and concluded that the best path forward for 
> the Forum is to complete a conversion to the RFC 3647 for the Baseline 
> Requirements with an initial step that merely moves existing content 
> from the Baseline Requirements into the RFC 3647 format.
>
> Available at 
> https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/CAB-Forum-BR-1.2.5-Ballot146-with-comments.pdf 
> is the proposed RFC-3647-formatted Baseline Requirements for the 
> Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates.
>
> Ben Wilson of DigiCert made the following motion, Tim Hollebeek from 
> Trustwave and Jody Cloutier from Microsoft have endorsed it.
>
> Motion Begins
>
> Be it resolved that the CA / Browser Forum adopts the attached CA/B 
> Forum Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of 
> Publicly-Trusted Certificates, v.1.2.5, effective upon adoption.
>
> Motion Ends
>
> The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on 
> Thursday 2 April 2015 and will close at 2200 UTC on Thursday 9 April 
> 2015. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the 
> voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 
> UTC on 16 April 2015.
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread. A vote 
> in favor of the ballot must indicate a clear ‘yes’ in the response. A 
> vote against the ballot must indicate a clear ‘no’ in the response. A 
> vote to abstain must indicate a clear ‘abstain’ in the response. 
> Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from 
> any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting 
> period will be counted.
>
> Voting members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/ 
> <https://cabforum.org/members/>. In order for the motion to be 
> adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA 
> category and more than one half of the votes cast by members in the 
> browser category must be in favor. Quorum is currently nine (9) 
> members– at least nine members must participate in the ballot, either 
> by voting in favor, voting against, or by abstaining for the vote to 
> be valid.
>
> A copy of this Ballot 146 is posted here:
>
> https://cabforum.org/2015/04/02/ballot-146-convert-baseline-requirements-to-rfc-3647-framework/ 
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150414/df8fcd76/attachment-0003.html>