[cabfpub] Ballot 148 - Issuer Field Correction (rev 1)

Fri Apr 3 22:02:20 UTC 2015

I’m sorry but this vote was received after the ballot had closed and will not be counted.

Dean Coclin

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Richard Wang
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 7:18 PM
To: Doug Beattie
Cc: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 148 - Issuer Field Correction (rev 1)

WoSign vote YES

Regards,

Richard

On Apr 3, 2015, at 00:12, Doug Beattie <doug.beattie at globalsign.com> wrote:

Voting closes today, please vote!

From: Doug Beattie 
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 1:40 PM
To: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Ballot 148 - Issuer Field Correction (rev 1)

I’m reposting Ballot 148 with new review and voting periods to address recent comments.

Ballot 148 - Issuer Field Correction (Rev 1)

________________________________________

Reason 

________________________________________

The issuer field language in Section 9.1 of the Baseline Requirements confuses two issues: 

1) the contents of the issuer field in an end entity cert and 

2) how to name root and intermediate CA certificates. 

To clarify the issue and ensure proper name chaining, this ballot fixes the issuer field requirements and, to clarify that commonName field is part of the distinguished name, moves all of the Subject Distinguished Name Field requirements under the proper section. The ballot also removes requirements around the domainComponent field as the field is not used by current TLS clients. A subsequent ballot will address naming of roots and intermediates under current Section 9.2.5. 

Doug Beattie of GlobalSign made the following motion, which was endorsed by Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert and Richard Wang of WoSign. 

________________________________________

Motion begins 

________________________________________

1) Replace Section 9.1 with the following: 

"9.1 Issuer Information 

The content of the Certificate Issuer Distinguished Name field MUST match the Subject DN of the Issuing CA to support Name chaining as specified in RFC 5280, section 4.1.2.4." 

2) Move Section 9.2.2 to 9.2.2(a) and renumber the subsequent sections as b-i. 

3) Delete Section 9.2.3. 

4) Renumber 9.2.4 as 9.2.2. 

5) In section 9.2, edit section reference “9.2.2” to “9.2.2 (a)”

6) Update section references 9.2.4 (f) to 9.2.2.(g) and 9.2.4 to 9.2.2 throughout document.

7) In Appendix B (Certificate Content and Extensions), Item (1) Root CA Certificates, add 

F. Subject Information

The Certificate Subject MUST contain the following

- countryName (OID 2.5.4.6).  This field MUST contain the two-letter ISO 3166-1 country code for the country in which the CA’s place of business is located.  

- organizationName (OID 2.5.4.10). This field MUST contain the name (or abbreviation thereof), trademark, or other meaningful identifier for the CA, provided that they accurately identify the CA.  The field MUST NOT contain exclusively a generic designation such as “Root 1”.

8) In Appendix B (Certificate Content and Extensions), Item (2) Subordinate CA Certificate, add 

H. The Certificate Subject MUST contain the following

- countryName (OID 2.5.4.6).  This field MUST contain the two-letter ISO 3166-1 country code for the country in which the CA’s place of business is located.  

- organizationName (OID 2.5.4.10). This field MUST contain the name (or abbreviation thereof), trademark, or other meaningful identifier for the CA, provided that they accurately identify the CA.  The field MUST NOT contain exclusively a generic designation such as “CA1”.

________________________________________

Motion Ends 

________________________________________

The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on 19 Mar 2015, and will close at 2200 UTC on 26 Mar 2015. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on 2 Apr 2015. Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread. 

A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: 

https://cabforum.org/members/ 

In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is currently nine (9) members– at least nine members must participate in the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150403/26677b84/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6130 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20150403/26677b84/attachment-0001.p7s>