[cabfpub] Ballot for limited exemption to RFC 5280 for CT implementation

Brian Smith brian at briansmith.org
Thu Sep 18 21:11:36 UTC 2014

On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi at google.com> wrote:
> This is the same arguments for Certificate != PreCertificate. The ASN.1
> diverges and distinguishes the two, the same conceptual way the contents of
> a tbsCertList differs from a tbsCertificate.
> The poison extension - a structural facet of a PreCert - is as
> distinguishing to RFC5280 as a different ASN.1 structure. It makes them
> different.

Then there is no need for this ballot, right?


More information about the Public mailing list