[cabfpub] Ballot 135 - ETSI Auditor Qualifications

[Moudrick M. Dadashov]

SSC votes: "Yes".

Thanks,
M.D.

On 10/3/2014 1:32 AM, Ben Wilson wrote:
>
> *Ballot 135 - ETSI Auditor Qualifications*
>
> Iñigo Barreira of Izenpe made the following motion and Moudrick 
> Dadashov of SSC, Rob Horne of Trustis, and Mads Henriksveen of Buypass 
> have endorsed it:
>
> *Reasons for proposed ballot*
>
> The CABF has asked ETSI for a procedure to identify qualified, 
> ETSI-accredited auditors in order to ensure that audits are properly 
> managed.
>
> The proponents of this ballot believe that the proposed modification 
> to this section makes it more accurate because it refers to a single, 
> reliable source (Annex E of ETSI TS 102 042).
>
> (While ETSI will include on its web site the accredited audit bodies, 
> the definitive information on ETSI auditor accreditation can be 
> obtained from the relevant national accreditation body, which should 
> be contacted for formal confirmation. Accreditation information is 
> generally available on the web site of the national accreditation 
> body, or often it can also be checked on the auditing body's web site, 
> if they have been properly accredited.)
>
> ---MOTION BEGINS---
>
> Bullet 4 of section 17.6 of the Baseline Requirements document 
> (Auditors qualifications) would be amended as follows:
>
> 4. (For audits conducted in accordance with any one of the ETSI 
> standards) accredited in accordance with _Annex E of_ ETSI TS _102 
> 042_ 119 403, or accredited to conduct such audits under an equivalent 
> national scheme, or accredited by a national accreditation body in 
> line with ISO 27006 to carry out ISO 27001 audits;
>
> The resulting provision would read:
>
> "4. (For audits conducted in accordance with any one of the ETSI 
> standards) accredited in accordance with Annex E of ETSI TS 102;"
>
> ---MOTION ENDS---
>
> The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on 
> Thursday, 2 October 2014, and will close at 2200 UTC on Thursday, 9 
> October 2014. Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, 
> the voting period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 
> 2200 UTC on Thursday, 16 October 2014. Votes must be cast by posting 
> an on-list reply to this thread.
>
> A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the 
> response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A 
> vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. 
> Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from 
> any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting 
> period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: 
> https://cabforum.org/members/
>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes 
> cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes 
> cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is 
> currently nine (9) members-- at least nine members must participate in 
> the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141010/c1d6ec7f/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3653 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141010/c1d6ec7f/attachment.bin