[cabfpub] about EV period for Gov

Richard Wang richard at wosign.com
Fri Nov 21 13:12:41 UTC 2014


In the "Let's Encrypt" time, no one care about the cert period, all are automatically renew.
So my this topic is NOT a topic now.

Regards,

Richard

> On Nov 21, 2014, at 17:19, "i-barreira at izenpe.net" <i-barreira at izenpe.net> wrote:
> 
> Basically in Europe (and depending on every national legislation) the vetting procedures are not tied to the lifecicle of the certificate. For example, for QCs, the vetting is every 5 years, but you can issue certs with lower validity periods.
> 
> 
> Iñigo Barreira
> Responsable del Área técnica
> i-barreira at izenpe.net
> 945067705
> 
> 
> ERNE! Baliteke mezu honen zatiren bat edo mezu osoa legez babestuta egotea. Mezua badu bere hartzailea. Okerreko helbidera heldu bada (helbidea gaizki idatzi, transmisioak huts egin) eman abisu igorleari, korreo honi erantzuna. KONTUZ!
> ATENCION! Este mensaje contiene informacion privilegiada o confidencial a la que solo tiene derecho a acceder el destinatario. Si usted lo recibe por error le agradeceriamos que no hiciera uso de la informacion y que se pusiese en contacto con el remitente.
> 
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] En nombre de Gervase Markham
> Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de noviembre de 2014 16:54
> Para: kirk_hall at trendmicro.com; CABFPub
> Asunto: Re: [cabfpub] about EV period for Gov
> 
>> On 19/11/14 00:23, kirk_hall at trendmicro.com wrote:
>> I’m not taking a position either way, but there are more possibilities 
>> if vetting cycles are not necessarily linked to maximum certificate 
>> lifespan.
> 
> That's an interesting idea.
> 
> Are CAs able to give some idea as to the relative weight behind various possible reasons for resistance to a lower maximum limit for certificate lifetime? Some reasons might be:
> 
> * Hassle and expense of doing the vetting again
> * Inconvenience for the customer in having to change their cert
> * (Other)
> 
> Gerv
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 7400 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141121/0ce94801/attachment-0001.p7s>


More information about the Public mailing list