[cabfpub] Revisiting CAA

[kirk_hall at trendmicro.com]

Can anyone identify one case -- even one -- of mis-issuance of a certificate by a CA that would have been prevented by CAA?  (I can't think of one.)

-----Original Message-----
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 2:07 AM
To: Rick Andrews; public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Revisiting CAA

On 01/05/14 23:26, Rick Andrews wrote:
> I’m attaching Phillip’s original proposal for CAA and Jeremy’s 
> suggestion for enhancement. Here’s my proposal.

I think the proposal is good, although the scare quotes around "procedure" are unnecessarily perjorative. If our plan is not to mandate that CAs explicitly honour CAA, then we should not seem to sneer at those who don't. So we should remove the words "(although not desirable)" too. Let's not try and have it both ways.

Gerv
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

<table class="TM_EMAIL_NOTICE"><tr><td><pre>
TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential 
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. 
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or 
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
</pre></td></tr></table>