[cabfpub] R: Denial of all insurance coverage for Diginotar
adriano.santoni at staff.aruba.it
Sat May 3 23:34:12 MST 2014
This automatic translation is rather difficult to understand, to me. Who was the Insurer in this case?
Inviato da Samsung Mobile.
<div>-------- Messaggio originale --------</div><div>Da: kirk_hall at trendmicro.com </div><div>Data:03/05/2014 23:02 (GMT+01:00) </div><div>A: "CABFPub (public at cabforum.org)" <public at cabforum.org> </div><div>Oggetto: [cabfpub] Denial of all insurance coverage for Diginotar </div><div>
</div>Jeremy, in response to your question below -- it was Bob Relyea who found the link during our last CABF meeting stating (in translation) that Diginotar’s insurer denied all coverage, so there was no possibility of any recovery for claims by the public or customers. See link. That’s why it makes sense to delete the current coverage requirements.
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Bob Relyea <bob at relyea.com>
To: Robert Relyea <rrelyea at redhat.com>
Sent: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:29:26 -0500 (EST)
From: Jeremy Rowley [mailto:jeremy.rowley at digicert.com]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 9:00 AM
To: Kirk Hall (RD-US); 'Gervase Markham'; public at cabforum.org
Subject: RE: [cabfpub] Ballot 121 - EVGL Insurance Requirements
Can you please send a link to the info about DigiNotar. This is the first I've heard that the insurance company didn't have to pay anything to damaged end users and would like to investigate further. My guess is that the claims were not being brought by the right party.
TREND MICRO EMAIL NOTICE
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential
and may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or
disclose this information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or
telephone and delete the original message from your mail system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Public