[cabfpub] Ballot 112 - Replace Definition of "Internal Server Name" with "Internal Name"

Ryan Sleevi sleevi at google.com
Fri Mar 21 14:46:49 UTC 2014

On Mar 21, 2014 7:40 AM, "Gervase Markham" <gerv at mozilla.org> wrote:
> On 21/03/14 14:34, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
>> No. That ballot is deferred.
> In which case, instead of:
> "because it does not end with a Top Level Domain registered in IANA’s
Root Zone Database"
> should we not say:
> "because it does not end with a Top Level Domain which is either
registered in IANA’s Root Zone Database, or a contract has been entered
into for such a registration"
> ?
> Gerv

Um, does that not do the opposite of what you want?

And internal server name is the name that CANNOT be verified as globally
unique, because the last label is absent from the Root Zone Database.

Your proposal would seem to have the effect of ALLOWING contracted names to
be considered unique, before their delegation event - which seems like the
proposal deferred.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20140321/b860e6a5/attachment-0003.html>

More information about the Public mailing list