[cabfpub] Ballot 117 - EV Code Signing Guidelines Corrections

Gervase Markham gerv at mozilla.org
Tue Mar 18 03:44:30 MST 2014


Mozilla votes Yes.

Gerv

On 18/03/14 04:27, Ben Wilson wrote:
> DigiCert votes yes.
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> *From:*Ben Wilson [mailto:ben at digicert.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 10, 2014 10:24 AM
> *To:* public at cabforum.org
> *Subject:* Ballot 117 - EV Code Signing Guidelines Corrections
> 
>  
> 
> Ballot 117 - EV Code Signing Guidelines Corrections
> 
>  
> 
> Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert made the following motion, and Iñigo Barreira
> of Izenpe and Rick Andrews of Symantec endorsed it.
> 
>  
> 
> There are two issues with the EV code signing guidelines that need
> correction:
> 
>  
> 
> 1.  Section 9.2.2 of the EV code signing guidelines recommends that CAs
> not include the SAN extension in an EV certificate.  However, section
> 9.7 requires that an EV certificate include
> subjectAltName:permanentIdentifier. Because the main concern is that a
> CA might include a domain name in the SAN extension, we should specify
> that this practice is not allowed and recognize that other information
> may be present.
> 
>  
> 
> 2.  Because the EV Code Signing Guidelines were originally based on the
> EV Guidelines for SSL, Section 9.2.3 of the EV code signing guidelines
> deprecates the CN field.  However, the CABF Code Signing Working Group
> received a report that this field is still required by code signing
> applications. We should still include the CN in code signing
> certificates for the Subscriber’s legal name, even though the field is
> deprecated for use in SSL/TLS certificates. 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ---Motion Begins---
> 
>  
> 
> Effective immediately:
> 
>  
> 
> a.            Replace section 9.2.2 with the following:
> 
> “9.2.2    Subject Alternative Name Extension
> 
> This field MUST be present and MUST contain the permanentIdentifier
> specified in Section 9.7. This field MUST NOT contain a Domain Name or
> IP Address.”
> 
>  
> 
> b.            Amend section 9.2.3 as follows:
> 
> “9.2.2    Subject Common Name Field
> 
> Certificate field: subject:commonName (OID 2.5.4.3)
> 
> Required/Optional: Required
> 
> Contents: This field MUST contain the Subject’s legal name as verified
> under Section 11.2.“
> 
>  
> 
> ---Motion ends---
> 
>  
> 
> Motion Ends
> 
>  
> 
> The review period for this ballot shall commence at 2200 UTC on Monday,
> 10 March 2014, and will close at 2200 UTC on Monday, 17 March 2014.
> 
>  
> 
> Unless the motion is withdrawn during the review period, the voting
> period will start immediately thereafter and will close at 2200 UTC on
> Monday, 24 March 2014.
> 
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.
> 
>  
> 
> A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response.
> 
>  
> 
> A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response.
> 
>  
> 
> A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response.
> Unclear responses will not be counted.
> 
>  
> 
> The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member
> before the close of the voting period will be counted.
> 
>  
> 
> Voting members are listed here:  https://cabforum.org/members/
> 
>  
> 
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes
> cast by members in the CA category and more than one half of the votes
> cast by members in the browser category must be in favor.
> 
> Quorum is currently six (6) members– at least six members must
> participate in the ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or
> by abstaining for the vote to be valid.
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
> 


More information about the Public mailing list