[cabfpub] CP review working group

[Gervase Markham]

On 15/07/14 10:23, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
> Out of curiosity, will the list and its archives be public? I understand
> for our historical WGs this is not practical, but it was not clear if
> this would be the way forward for new WGs.

>From section 5.3 of the Bylaws 1.1:

"With the approval of the Chair, Working Groups may establish separate
list-servs, wikis, and web pages for their communications, but all such
separate list-servs must be managed in the same fashion as the Public
Mail List."

So yes, the list should be public.

Gerv