[cabfpub] Ballot 128 - Creation of the CP Review Working Group

[Mert ÖZARAR]

TURKTRUST votes YES ...


On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Adriano Santoni - Actalis S.p.A. <
adriano.santoni at staff.aruba.it> wrote:

>  Actalis abstains.
>
> Il 03/07/2014 18:10, Jeremy Rowley ha scritto:
>
>  DigiCert votes “YES”
>
>
>
> *From:* Jeremy Rowley [mailto:jeremy.rowley at digicert.com
> <jeremy.rowley at digicert.com>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 25, 2014 4:55 AM
> *To:* 'CABFPub'
> *Subject:* New working group
>
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> During the CAB Forum face-to-face meeting, we discussed creating a working
> group to compare the NIST IR proposal and various with the existing CAB
> Forum work product. The group will also continue our contemplation on
> converting to a 3647 format to make future comparisons easier.
>
>
>
> Many of the ideas encompassed in these other standards documents are great
> ideas that could improve the BRs, EV Guidelines, or Network Security
> Guidelines.  Although the Forum may not adopt the specific language
> presented in these documents, we certainly can use the previous work
> product as a starting point for discussion.  This group is tasked with
> identifying those starting point and either bringing them to the main CAB
> Forum or making recommended ballot proposals.
>
>
>
> Most CPs, including the NIST IR, are formatted in a 3647 format.  The BRs
> are a CP that lacks this format.  Having the CAB Forum use an RFC-complaint
> format will increase the ease in comparing new and existing guidelines with
> Forum work product.  The group will look at the 3647 conversion work
> already completed and decide whether the CAB Forum should continue the
> project.
>
>
>
> To accommodate these goals, we plan to create the new CP Review Working
> Group.  I look forward to the discussions.
>
>
>
> *Ballot 128 – CP Review Working Group*
>
>
>
> Jeremy Rowley (DigiCert) made the following motion, endorsed by Dean
> Coclin (Symantec) and Doug Beattie (GlobalSign).
>
>
>
> *---MOTION BEGINS---*
>
>
>
> The CAB Forum shall create a Working Group called the CP Review Working
> Group.
>
>
>
> Scope: The CP Review Working Group will (i) consider existing and proposed
> standards, (ii) create a list of potential improvements based on the
> considered standards that improve the existing CAB Forum work product,
> (iii) evaluate the transition to a 3647 format based on the amount.
>
>
>
> Deliverables: The Working Group will produce topics of discussion and
> proposed ballots that improve the CA infrastructure based on existing
> standards and documents.  The Working Group will also make a recommendation
> on whether to finish the 3647 conversion. Of course, all work product
> produced by the Working Group is non-binding on the forum until officially
> adopted by ballot.
>
>
>
> *… MOTION ENDS …*
>
>
>
> The review period starts on Wednesday, June 25, 2014 and ends on July 2,
> 2014. Voting starts at 2200 UTC on Wednesday, July 2, 2014. The voting
> period will close at 2200 UTC on Wednesday, July 9, 2014.
>
>
>
> Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread.
>
>
>
> A vote in favor of the ballot must indicate a clear ‘yes’ in the response.
>
> A vote against the ballot must indicate a clear ‘no’ in the response.
>
> A vote to abstain must indicate a clear ‘abstain’ in the response.
>
> Unclear responses will not be counted.
>
>
>
> The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before
> the close of the voting period will be counted.
>
>
>
> Voting members are listed here: http://www.cabforum.org/forum.html
>
>
>
> In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes
> cast by members in the CA category and more than one half of the votes cast
> by members in the browser category must be in favor. Also, quorum is
> currently six (6) members– at least six members must participate in the
> ballot, either by voting in favor, voting against, or by abstaining for the
> vote to be valid.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing listPublic at cabforum.orghttps://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Public mailing list
> Public at cabforum.org
> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>


-- 
Mert Özarar
mert.ozarar at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20140708/e26f1a6c/attachment-0003.html>