[cabfpub] Ballot 110 - Motion to Adopt Version 1.1 of the Bylaws

Dean Coclin Dean_Coclin at symantec.com
Wed Jan 22 22:07:52 UTC 2014

Given the current discussions in the CSWG, #3 is the only option. We have full 
intention of making the information public in the form of the CS BRs once 


-----Original Message-----
From: Gervase Markham [mailto:gerv at mozilla.org]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 4:26 AM
To: Jeremy Rowley; Dean Coclin; 'Wayne Thayer'; 'Ryan Sleevi'; 'Ben Wilson'
Cc: 'CABFPub'
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 110 - Motion to Adopt Version 1.1 of the Bylaws

On 21/01/14 18:25, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> I don't mind having the EV discussion public, but I agree with Dean
> about the CSWG list. Some of the discussion contains pseudo-sensitive 
> information.

This problem often arises when lists are created private and then should be 
made public :-| We could:

1) purge the archives
2) establish a new list
3) leave CSWG private

I'd like to avoid 3) long term, but that seems to rather imply doing one of 1) 
or 2) eventually...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6130 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20140122/64f00d45/attachment-0001.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list