[cabfpub] Ballot 110 - Motion to Adopt Version 1.1 of the Bylaws

[Gervase Markham]

On 21/01/14 18:25, Jeremy Rowley wrote:
> I don't mind having the EV discussion public, but I agree with Dean about
> the CSWG list. Some of the discussion contains pseudo-sensitive information.

This problem often arises when lists are created private and then should
be made public :-| We could:

1) purge the archives
2) establish a new list
3) leave CSWG private

I'd like to avoid 3) long term, but that seems to rather imply doing one
of 1) or 2) eventually...

Gerv