[cabfpub] Post-Ballot 110 Bylaw Issues

[Gervase Markham]

On 06/02/14 15:30, Dean Coclin wrote:
> Actually I don't think that's how we concluded. The company in
> question that began with a "C" did not meet the CA criteria because
> they did not have a publicly trusted root that issued SSL or code
> signing certs. 

I thought we thought they did? But no matter. Let's do this:

> So we
> agreed to admit them as an Interested Party (provided they signed the
> IPR) until we had a chance to discuss the categories again at the F2F
> meeting.

and discuss it F2F.

Gerv