[cabfpub] Breach Insurance

[Dean Coclin]

Thanks Ben. I’m assuming you are posting this with regards to the recent insurance debate. Although I was initially opposed to dropping the EV Insurance requirement, my thinking has changed as others have posted facts about the type of insurance that the EVGL require and appropriateness to its intended use. Symantec’s current position would be in favor of ballot 142 (Gerv’s elimination ballot). The article you linked to below seems to favor a different type of insurance than what we currently require. Are you thinking of proposing a change to the insurance type (i.e. Cyberbreach/cyberliability insurance)?

 

Dean

 

From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:42 AM
To: CABFPub
Subject: [cabfpub] Breach Insurance

 

Received this in my email today:

 

 <http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/12/09/security-data-breach-insurance-target/20011477/> http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2014/12/09/security-data-breach-insurance-target/20011477/ 

Cheers,

Ben

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141218/c9e5ea21/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6130 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141218/c9e5ea21/attachment-0001.p7s>