[cabfpub] Ballot 142 - Elimination of EV Insurance Requirement

[Eddy Nigg]

On 12/02/2014 07:58 PM, kirk_hall at trendmicro.com wrote:
> And to be blunt, I was disappointed that Mozilla was pushing forward with its proposal to drop the EV insurance requirement by itself

Just for the record, Gerv stated several times that this is exactly what 
they'd support and two ballots already failed because of 
non-coordination and misunderstandings....

> , when I  had publicly stated for some weeks that I was working on new financial responsibility requirements for CAs to substitute for the insurance requirements we were planning to remove.

...and this might take a while until agreement. I'm not sure if there is 
a holy grail for which requirements should be set in place, but we know 
for sure that the current ones are simply money thrown out the window. 
And a lot for that matter....

>    I think it sends a bad message to the public otherwise.

Probably true, but having requirements in place that don't do anything 
is perhaps even a worse message.

I'd suggest (for the next meeting) to adopt Gerv's ballot and then work 
on something CAs and browser can agree to.

-- 
Regards
Signer: 	Eddy Nigg, COO/CTO
	StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
XMPP: 	startcom at startcom.org <xmpp:startcom at startcom.org>
Blog: 	Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Twitter: 	Follow Me <http://twitter.com/eddy_nigg>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141203/214e36da/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4313 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20141203/214e36da/attachment-0001.p7s>