[cabfpub] Ballot 122 - Verified Method of Communication

Ben Wilson ben at digicert.com
Mon Apr 21 16:12:17 UTC 2014

Thanks, Iida.  The ballot voting that starts tomorrow will reflect that the reference is to ITU-T E.164.  Somehow that character and the space were deleted before I hit "send".  Since this is the discussion period, please let everyone know if you have objections or other amendments prior to commencement of the voting period.   As discussed on the call last Thursday, the purpose of the provision is to establish a trusted communication that takes place:  using a telephone number (bi-directional addressing), at a postal address (that can be replaced with other means once that out-of-band communication has been established - e.g. exchange of a shared secret code), and an email address used for official communications, as listed in a QGIS or QIIS.
-----Original Message-----
From: public-bounces at cabforum.org [mailto:public-bounces at cabforum.org] On Behalf Of y-iida at secom.co.jp
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2014 6:21 PM
To: ben at digicert.com
Cc: public at cabforum.org
Subject: Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 122 - Verified Method of Communication

What I just wanted to point out was that he might forgot letter `T'.

Thanks for quoting Japanese Wikipedia.

>>ITU-T E.164?
>>>" Verified Method of Communication: The use of a public 
>>>telecommunication routing number (ITU-E.164-compliant fixed, mobile, 
>>>fax, or SMS), an email
Public mailing list
Public at cabforum.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5453 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/public/attachments/20140421/71c1c0fb/attachment-0001.p7s>

More information about the Public mailing list